| relay interface (formerly relayfs) |
| ================================== |
| |
| The relay interface provides a means for kernel applications to |
| efficiently log and transfer large quantities of data from the kernel |
| to userspace via user-defined 'relay channels'. |
| |
| A 'relay channel' is a kernel->user data relay mechanism implemented |
| as a set of per-cpu kernel buffers ('channel buffers'), each |
| represented as a regular file ('relay file') in user space. Kernel |
| clients write into the channel buffers using efficient write |
| functions; these automatically log into the current cpu's channel |
| buffer. User space applications mmap() or read() from the relay files |
| and retrieve the data as it becomes available. The relay files |
| themselves are files created in a host filesystem, e.g. debugfs, and |
| are associated with the channel buffers using the API described below. |
| |
| The format of the data logged into the channel buffers is completely |
| up to the kernel client; the relay interface does however provide |
| hooks which allow kernel clients to impose some structure on the |
| buffer data. The relay interface doesn't implement any form of data |
| filtering - this also is left to the kernel client. The purpose is to |
| keep things as simple as possible. |
| |
| This document provides an overview of the relay interface API. The |
| details of the function parameters are documented along with the |
| functions in the relay interface code - please see that for details. |
| |
| Semantics |
| ========= |
| |
| Each relay channel has one buffer per CPU, each buffer has one or more |
| sub-buffers. Messages are written to the first sub-buffer until it is |
| too full to contain a new message, in which case it is written to |
| the next (if available). Messages are never split across sub-buffers. |
| At this point, userspace can be notified so it empties the first |
| sub-buffer, while the kernel continues writing to the next. |
| |
| When notified that a sub-buffer is full, the kernel knows how many |
| bytes of it are padding i.e. unused space occurring because a complete |
| message couldn't fit into a sub-buffer. Userspace can use this |
| knowledge to copy only valid data. |
| |
| After copying it, userspace can notify the kernel that a sub-buffer |
| has been consumed. |
| |
| A relay channel can operate in a mode where it will overwrite data not |
| yet collected by userspace, and not wait for it to be consumed. |
| |
| The relay channel itself does not provide for communication of such |
| data between userspace and kernel, allowing the kernel side to remain |
| simple and not impose a single interface on userspace. It does |
| provide a set of examples and a separate helper though, described |
| below. |
| |
| The read() interface both removes padding and internally consumes the |
| read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being used to drain |
| the channel buffers, special-purpose communication between kernel and |
| user isn't necessary for basic operation. |
| |
| One of the major goals of the relay interface is to provide a low |
| overhead mechanism for conveying kernel data to userspace. While the |
| read() interface is easy to use, it's not as efficient as the mmap() |
| approach; the example code attempts to make the tradeoff between the |
| two approaches as small as possible. |
| |
| klog and relay-apps example code |
| ================================ |
| |
| The relay interface itself is ready to use, but to make things easier, |
| a couple simple utility functions and a set of examples are provided. |
| |
| The relay-apps example tarball, available on the relay sourceforge |
| site, contains a set of self-contained examples, each consisting of a |
| pair of .c files containing boilerplate code for each of the user and |
| kernel sides of a relay application. When combined these two sets of |
| boilerplate code provide glue to easily stream data to disk, without |
| having to bother with mundane housekeeping chores. |
| |
| The 'klog debugging functions' patch (klog.patch in the relay-apps |
| tarball) provides a couple of high-level logging functions to the |
| kernel which allow writing formatted text or raw data to a channel, |
| regardless of whether a channel to write into exists or not, or even |
| whether the relay interface is compiled into the kernel or not. These |
| functions allow you to put unconditional 'trace' statements anywhere |
| in the kernel or kernel modules; only when there is a 'klog handler' |
| registered will data actually be logged (see the klog and kleak |
| examples for details). |
| |
| It is of course possible to use the relay interface from scratch, |
| i.e. without using any of the relay-apps example code or klog, but |
| you'll have to implement communication between userspace and kernel, |
| allowing both to convey the state of buffers (full, empty, amount of |
| padding). The read() interface both removes padding and internally |
| consumes the read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being |
| used to drain the channel buffers, special-purpose communication |
| between kernel and user isn't necessary for basic operation. Things |
| such as buffer-full conditions would still need to be communicated via |
| some channel though. |
| |
| klog and the relay-apps examples can be found in the relay-apps |
| tarball on http://relayfs.sourceforge.net |
| |
| The relay interface user space API |
| ================================== |
| |
| The relay interface implements basic file operations for user space |
| access to relay channel buffer data. Here are the file operations |
| that are available and some comments regarding their behavior: |
| |
| open() enables user to open an _existing_ channel buffer. |
| |
| mmap() results in channel buffer being mapped into the caller's |
| memory space. Note that you can't do a partial mmap - you |
| must map the entire file, which is NRBUF * SUBBUFSIZE. |
| |
| read() read the contents of a channel buffer. The bytes read are |
| 'consumed' by the reader, i.e. they won't be available |
| again to subsequent reads. If the channel is being used |
| in no-overwrite mode (the default), it can be read at any |
| time even if there's an active kernel writer. If the |
| channel is being used in overwrite mode and there are |
| active channel writers, results may be unpredictable - |
| users should make sure that all logging to the channel has |
| ended before using read() with overwrite mode. Sub-buffer |
| padding is automatically removed and will not be seen by |
| the reader. |
| |
| sendfile() transfer data from a channel buffer to an output file |
| descriptor. Sub-buffer padding is automatically removed |
| and will not be seen by the reader. |
| |
| poll() POLLIN/POLLRDNORM/POLLERR supported. User applications are |
| notified when sub-buffer boundaries are crossed. |
| |
| close() decrements the channel buffer's refcount. When the refcount |
| reaches 0, i.e. when no process or kernel client has the |
| buffer open, the channel buffer is freed. |
| |
| In order for a user application to make use of relay files, the |
| host filesystem must be mounted. For example, |
| |
| mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug |
| |
| NOTE: the host filesystem doesn't need to be mounted for kernel |
| clients to create or use channels - it only needs to be |
| mounted when user space applications need access to the buffer |
| data. |
| |
| |
| The relay interface kernel API |
| ============================== |
| |
| Here's a summary of the API the relay interface provides to in-kernel clients: |
| |
| TBD(curr. line MT:/API/) |
| channel management functions: |
| |
| relay_open(base_filename, parent, subbuf_size, n_subbufs, |
| callbacks, private_data) |
| relay_close(chan) |
| relay_flush(chan) |
| relay_reset(chan) |
| |
| channel management typically called on instigation of userspace: |
| |
| relay_subbufs_consumed(chan, cpu, subbufs_consumed) |
| |
| write functions: |
| |
| relay_write(chan, data, length) |
| __relay_write(chan, data, length) |
| relay_reserve(chan, length) |
| |
| callbacks: |
| |
| subbuf_start(buf, subbuf, prev_subbuf, prev_padding) |
| buf_mapped(buf, filp) |
| buf_unmapped(buf, filp) |
| create_buf_file(filename, parent, mode, buf, is_global) |
| remove_buf_file(dentry) |
| |
| helper functions: |
| |
| relay_buf_full(buf) |
| subbuf_start_reserve(buf, length) |
| |
| |
| Creating a channel |
| ------------------ |
| |
| relay_open() is used to create a channel, along with its per-cpu |
| channel buffers. Each channel buffer will have an associated file |
| created for it in the host filesystem, which can be and mmapped or |
| read from in user space. The files are named basename0...basenameN-1 |
| where N is the number of online cpus, and by default will be created |
| in the root of the filesystem (if the parent param is NULL). If you |
| want a directory structure to contain your relay files, you should |
| create it using the host filesystem's directory creation function, |
| e.g. debugfs_create_dir(), and pass the parent directory to |
| relay_open(). Users are responsible for cleaning up any directory |
| structure they create, when the channel is closed - again the host |
| filesystem's directory removal functions should be used for that, |
| e.g. debugfs_remove(). |
| |
| In order for a channel to be created and the host filesystem's files |
| associated with its channel buffers, the user must provide definitions |
| for two callback functions, create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file(). |
| create_buf_file() is called once for each per-cpu buffer from |
| relay_open() and allows the user to create the file which will be used |
| to represent the corresponding channel buffer. The callback should |
| return the dentry of the file created to represent the channel buffer. |
| remove_buf_file() must also be defined; it's responsible for deleting |
| the file(s) created in create_buf_file() and is called during |
| relay_close(). |
| |
| Here are some typical definitions for these callbacks, in this case |
| using debugfs: |
| |
| /* |
| * create_buf_file() callback. Creates relay file in debugfs. |
| */ |
| static struct dentry *create_buf_file_handler(const char *filename, |
| struct dentry *parent, |
| umode_t mode, |
| struct rchan_buf *buf, |
| int *is_global) |
| { |
| return debugfs_create_file(filename, mode, parent, buf, |
| &relay_file_operations); |
| } |
| |
| /* |
| * remove_buf_file() callback. Removes relay file from debugfs. |
| */ |
| static int remove_buf_file_handler(struct dentry *dentry) |
| { |
| debugfs_remove(dentry); |
| |
| return 0; |
| } |
| |
| /* |
| * relay interface callbacks |
| */ |
| static struct rchan_callbacks relay_callbacks = |
| { |
| .create_buf_file = create_buf_file_handler, |
| .remove_buf_file = remove_buf_file_handler, |
| }; |
| |
| And an example relay_open() invocation using them: |
| |
| chan = relay_open("cpu", NULL, SUBBUF_SIZE, N_SUBBUFS, &relay_callbacks, NULL); |
| |
| If the create_buf_file() callback fails, or isn't defined, channel |
| creation and thus relay_open() will fail. |
| |
| The total size of each per-cpu buffer is calculated by multiplying the |
| number of sub-buffers by the sub-buffer size passed into relay_open(). |
| The idea behind sub-buffers is that they're basically an extension of |
| double-buffering to N buffers, and they also allow applications to |
| easily implement random-access-on-buffer-boundary schemes, which can |
| be important for some high-volume applications. The number and size |
| of sub-buffers is completely dependent on the application and even for |
| the same application, different conditions will warrant different |
| values for these parameters at different times. Typically, the right |
| values to use are best decided after some experimentation; in general, |
| though, it's safe to assume that having only 1 sub-buffer is a bad |
| idea - you're guaranteed to either overwrite data or lose events |
| depending on the channel mode being used. |
| |
| The create_buf_file() implementation can also be defined in such a way |
| as to allow the creation of a single 'global' buffer instead of the |
| default per-cpu set. This can be useful for applications interested |
| mainly in seeing the relative ordering of system-wide events without |
| the need to bother with saving explicit timestamps for the purpose of |
| merging/sorting per-cpu files in a postprocessing step. |
| |
| To have relay_open() create a global buffer, the create_buf_file() |
| implementation should set the value of the is_global outparam to a |
| non-zero value in addition to creating the file that will be used to |
| represent the single buffer. In the case of a global buffer, |
| create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file() will be called only once. The |
| normal channel-writing functions, e.g. relay_write(), can still be |
| used - writes from any cpu will transparently end up in the global |
| buffer - but since it is a global buffer, callers should make sure |
| they use the proper locking for such a buffer, either by wrapping |
| writes in a spinlock, or by copying a write function from relay.h and |
| creating a local version that internally does the proper locking. |
| |
| The private_data passed into relay_open() allows clients to associate |
| user-defined data with a channel, and is immediately available |
| (including in create_buf_file()) via chan->private_data or |
| buf->chan->private_data. |
| |
| Buffer-only channels |
| -------------------- |
| |
| These channels have no files associated and can be created with |
| relay_open(NULL, NULL, ...). Such channels are useful in scenarios such |
| as when doing early tracing in the kernel, before the VFS is up. In these |
| cases, one may open a buffer-only channel and then call |
| relay_late_setup_files() when the kernel is ready to handle files, |
| to expose the buffered data to the userspace. |
| |
| Channel 'modes' |
| --------------- |
| |
| relay channels can be used in either of two modes - 'overwrite' or |
| 'no-overwrite'. The mode is entirely determined by the implementation |
| of the subbuf_start() callback, as described below. The default if no |
| subbuf_start() callback is defined is 'no-overwrite' mode. If the |
| default mode suits your needs, and you plan to use the read() |
| interface to retrieve channel data, you can ignore the details of this |
| section, as it pertains mainly to mmap() implementations. |
| |
| In 'overwrite' mode, also known as 'flight recorder' mode, writes |
| continuously cycle around the buffer and will never fail, but will |
| unconditionally overwrite old data regardless of whether it's actually |
| been consumed. In no-overwrite mode, writes will fail, i.e. data will |
| be lost, if the number of unconsumed sub-buffers equals the total |
| number of sub-buffers in the channel. It should be clear that if |
| there is no consumer or if the consumer can't consume sub-buffers fast |
| enough, data will be lost in either case; the only difference is |
| whether data is lost from the beginning or the end of a buffer. |
| |
| As explained above, a relay channel is made of up one or more |
| per-cpu channel buffers, each implemented as a circular buffer |
| subdivided into one or more sub-buffers. Messages are written into |
| the current sub-buffer of the channel's current per-cpu buffer via the |
| write functions described below. Whenever a message can't fit into |
| the current sub-buffer, because there's no room left for it, the |
| client is notified via the subbuf_start() callback that a switch to a |
| new sub-buffer is about to occur. The client uses this callback to 1) |
| initialize the next sub-buffer if appropriate 2) finalize the previous |
| sub-buffer if appropriate and 3) return a boolean value indicating |
| whether or not to actually move on to the next sub-buffer. |
| |
| To implement 'no-overwrite' mode, the userspace client would provide |
| an implementation of the subbuf_start() callback something like the |
| following: |
| |
| static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf, |
| void *subbuf, |
| void *prev_subbuf, |
| unsigned int prev_padding) |
| { |
| if (prev_subbuf) |
| *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding; |
| |
| if (relay_buf_full(buf)) |
| return 0; |
| |
| subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int)); |
| |
| return 1; |
| } |
| |
| If the current buffer is full, i.e. all sub-buffers remain unconsumed, |
| the callback returns 0 to indicate that the buffer switch should not |
| occur yet, i.e. until the consumer has had a chance to read the |
| current set of ready sub-buffers. For the relay_buf_full() function |
| to make sense, the consumer is responsible for notifying the relay |
| interface when sub-buffers have been consumed via |
| relay_subbufs_consumed(). Any subsequent attempts to write into the |
| buffer will again invoke the subbuf_start() callback with the same |
| parameters; only when the consumer has consumed one or more of the |
| ready sub-buffers will relay_buf_full() return 0, in which case the |
| buffer switch can continue. |
| |
| The implementation of the subbuf_start() callback for 'overwrite' mode |
| would be very similar: |
| |
| static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf, |
| void *subbuf, |
| void *prev_subbuf, |
| size_t prev_padding) |
| { |
| if (prev_subbuf) |
| *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding; |
| |
| subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int)); |
| |
| return 1; |
| } |
| |
| In this case, the relay_buf_full() check is meaningless and the |
| callback always returns 1, causing the buffer switch to occur |
| unconditionally. It's also meaningless for the client to use the |
| relay_subbufs_consumed() function in this mode, as it's never |
| consulted. |
| |
| The default subbuf_start() implementation, used if the client doesn't |
| define any callbacks, or doesn't define the subbuf_start() callback, |
| implements the simplest possible 'no-overwrite' mode, i.e. it does |
| nothing but return 0. |
| |
| Header information can be reserved at the beginning of each sub-buffer |
| by calling the subbuf_start_reserve() helper function from within the |
| subbuf_start() callback. This reserved area can be used to store |
| whatever information the client wants. In the example above, room is |
| reserved in each sub-buffer to store the padding count for that |
| sub-buffer. This is filled in for the previous sub-buffer in the |
| subbuf_start() implementation; the padding value for the previous |
| sub-buffer is passed into the subbuf_start() callback along with a |
| pointer to the previous sub-buffer, since the padding value isn't |
| known until a sub-buffer is filled. The subbuf_start() callback is |
| also called for the first sub-buffer when the channel is opened, to |
| give the client a chance to reserve space in it. In this case the |
| previous sub-buffer pointer passed into the callback will be NULL, so |
| the client should check the value of the prev_subbuf pointer before |
| writing into the previous sub-buffer. |
| |
| Writing to a channel |
| -------------------- |
| |
| Kernel clients write data into the current cpu's channel buffer using |
| relay_write() or __relay_write(). relay_write() is the main logging |
| function - it uses local_irqsave() to protect the buffer and should be |
| used if you might be logging from interrupt context. If you know |
| you'll never be logging from interrupt context, you can use |
| __relay_write(), which only disables preemption. These functions |
| don't return a value, so you can't determine whether or not they |
| failed - the assumption is that you wouldn't want to check a return |
| value in the fast logging path anyway, and that they'll always succeed |
| unless the buffer is full and no-overwrite mode is being used, in |
| which case you can detect a failed write in the subbuf_start() |
| callback by calling the relay_buf_full() helper function. |
| |
| relay_reserve() is used to reserve a slot in a channel buffer which |
| can be written to later. This would typically be used in applications |
| that need to write directly into a channel buffer without having to |
| stage data in a temporary buffer beforehand. Because the actual write |
| may not happen immediately after the slot is reserved, applications |
| using relay_reserve() can keep a count of the number of bytes actually |
| written, either in space reserved in the sub-buffers themselves or as |
| a separate array. See the 'reserve' example in the relay-apps tarball |
| at http://relayfs.sourceforge.net for an example of how this can be |
| done. Because the write is under control of the client and is |
| separated from the reserve, relay_reserve() doesn't protect the buffer |
| at all - it's up to the client to provide the appropriate |
| synchronization when using relay_reserve(). |
| |
| Closing a channel |
| ----------------- |
| |
| The client calls relay_close() when it's finished using the channel. |
| The channel and its associated buffers are destroyed when there are no |
| longer any references to any of the channel buffers. relay_flush() |
| forces a sub-buffer switch on all the channel buffers, and can be used |
| to finalize and process the last sub-buffers before the channel is |
| closed. |
| |
| Misc |
| ---- |
| |
| Some applications may want to keep a channel around and re-use it |
| rather than open and close a new channel for each use. relay_reset() |
| can be used for this purpose - it resets a channel to its initial |
| state without reallocating channel buffer memory or destroying |
| existing mappings. It should however only be called when it's safe to |
| do so, i.e. when the channel isn't currently being written to. |
| |
| Finally, there are a couple of utility callbacks that can be used for |
| different purposes. buf_mapped() is called whenever a channel buffer |
| is mmapped from user space and buf_unmapped() is called when it's |
| unmapped. The client can use this notification to trigger actions |
| within the kernel application, such as enabling/disabling logging to |
| the channel. |
| |
| |
| Resources |
| ========= |
| |
| For news, example code, mailing list, etc. see the relay interface homepage: |
| |
| http://relayfs.sourceforge.net |
| |
| |
| Credits |
| ======= |
| |
| The ideas and specs for the relay interface came about as a result of |
| discussions on tracing involving the following: |
| |
| Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca> |
| Richard Moore <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com> |
| Bob Wisniewski <bob@watson.ibm.com> |
| Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com> |
| Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com> |
| |
| Also thanks to Hubertus Franke for a lot of useful suggestions and bug |
| reports. |