x25: bit and/or confusion in x25_ioctl()?
Looking at commit ebc3f64b864f it appears that this was intended
and not the original, equivalent to `if (facilities.reverse & ~0x81)'.
In x25_parse_facilities() that patch changed how facilities->reverse
was set. No other bits were set than 0x80 and/or 0x01.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
index ebbfe6b..e19d811 100644
--- a/net/x25/af_x25.c
+++ b/net/x25/af_x25.c
@@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@
facilities.throughput > 0xDD)
break;
if (facilities.reverse &&
- (facilities.reverse | 0x81)!= 0x81)
+ (facilities.reverse & 0x81) != 0x81)
break;
x25->facilities = facilities;
rc = 0;