xfs: use WRITE_SYNC_PLUG for synchronous writeout
The VM and I/O schedulers now expect us to use WRITE_SYNC_PLUG for
synchronous writeout. Right now I can't see any changes in performance
numbers with this, but we're getting some beating for not using it,
and the knowledge definitely could help the block code to make better
decisions.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c
index c2e30ee..d13fc73 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c
@@ -412,8 +412,9 @@
STATIC void
xfs_submit_ioend_bio(
- xfs_ioend_t *ioend,
- struct bio *bio)
+ struct writeback_control *wbc,
+ xfs_ioend_t *ioend,
+ struct bio *bio)
{
atomic_inc(&ioend->io_remaining);
bio->bi_private = ioend;
@@ -426,7 +427,8 @@
if (xfs_ioend_new_eof(ioend))
xfs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(XFS_I(ioend->io_inode));
- submit_bio(WRITE, bio);
+ submit_bio(wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL ?
+ WRITE_SYNC_PLUG : WRITE, bio);
ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_EOPNOTSUPP));
bio_put(bio);
}
@@ -505,6 +507,7 @@
*/
STATIC void
xfs_submit_ioend(
+ struct writeback_control *wbc,
xfs_ioend_t *ioend)
{
xfs_ioend_t *head = ioend;
@@ -533,19 +536,19 @@
retry:
bio = xfs_alloc_ioend_bio(bh);
} else if (bh->b_blocknr != lastblock + 1) {
- xfs_submit_ioend_bio(ioend, bio);
+ xfs_submit_ioend_bio(wbc, ioend, bio);
goto retry;
}
if (bio_add_buffer(bio, bh) != bh->b_size) {
- xfs_submit_ioend_bio(ioend, bio);
+ xfs_submit_ioend_bio(wbc, ioend, bio);
goto retry;
}
lastblock = bh->b_blocknr;
}
if (bio)
- xfs_submit_ioend_bio(ioend, bio);
+ xfs_submit_ioend_bio(wbc, ioend, bio);
xfs_finish_ioend(ioend, 0);
} while ((ioend = next) != NULL);
}
@@ -1198,7 +1201,7 @@
}
if (iohead)
- xfs_submit_ioend(iohead);
+ xfs_submit_ioend(wbc, iohead);
return page_dirty;
