tree e7c1445866cf4ed306ffd39e1fd520f2b761566a
parent 95eacd27e2a0924f1435654c06712cee6be099ad
author Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> 1191277697 -0700
committer David S. Miller <davem@sunset.davemloft.net> 1192060439 -0700

[TCP]: Update comment of SACK block validator

Just came across what RFC2018 states about generation of valid
SACK blocks in case of reneging. Alter comment a bit to point
out clearly.

IMHO, there isn't any reason to change code because the
validation is there for a purpose (counters will inform user
about decision TCP made if this case ever surfaces).

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>